欢迎访问新加坡聚知刊出版有限公司官方网站
info@juzhikan.asia
Audit Process, Reliability and Expectation Gap: A Comprehensive Analysis
  • ISSN:3041-0843(Online) 3041-0797(Print)
  • DOI:10.69979/3041-0843.26.02.068
  • 出版频率:Quarterly Publication
  • 语言:English
  • 收录数据库:ISSN:https://portal.issn.org/ ; 中国知网:https://scholar.cnki.net/journal/search; RCCSE权威核心学术期刊:http://qk.nseac.com

Audit Process, Reliability and Expectation Gap: A Comprehensive Analysis

Jiang Tao

International Accounting and Financial Management, University of Glasgow, Glasgow,UK.226011;

Abstract:This paper systematically reviews the complete process of corporate financial audit, including audit planning, audit testing and audit completion. It analyzes the factors that support audit reliability from the perspectives of auditing standards, the UK Companies Act 2006, International Accounting Standards and professional ethics. Meanwhile, the study identifies key threats to audit reliability, such as insufficient audit evidence, corporate errors and fraud, inappropriate risk assessment and lack of auditor independence, with typical cases including Enron and WorldCom. In addition, the paper explains the audit expectation gap, which refers to the divergence between financial statement users’ expectations and auditors’ actual responsibilities. The conclusion shows that standardized audit systems and procedures can generally guarantee reasonable assurance, while audit failures still occur due to practical limitations and human factors.

Keywords:Audit process; Audit reliability; Audit expectation gap; Internal control; Audit evidence

References

[1]Arens, A.A., Beasley, M., & Elder, R. (2016). *Auditing and Assurance Services* (16th ed.). Pearson.

[2]Ashbaugh, H., & Pincus, M. (2001). Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and the predictability of earnings. *Journal of Accounting Research*, 39(2), 417–434.

[3]Barth, M.E., Konchitchki, Y., & Landsman, W.R. (2007). Cost of capital and financial statement transparency. Stanford University Working Paper.

[4]Bona-Sánchez, C., Pérez-Alemán, J., & Santana-Martin, D.J. (2017). Sustainability disclosure, dominant owners and earnings informativeness. *Research in International Business and Finance*, 39, 625–634.

[5]Brown, P., Beekes, W., & Verhoeven, P. (2010). Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review. *Accounting & Finance*, 51(1), 96–172.

[6]Bryson, J.M. (2018). *Strategic Planning for Public and Non-Profit Organizations*. Wiley.

[7]Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. *Business Strategy and the Environment*, 26(5), 640–655.

[8]Mironiuc, M., Chersan, I.C., & Robu, I.B. (2013). Ethics in providing non-audit services to ensure transparency in financial reporting. *Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences*, 81, 474–480.

[9]Rodgers, W., Mubako, G.N., & Hall, L. (2017). Knowledge transfer and professional skepticism in audit planning. *Computers in Human Behavior*, 70, 564–574.

[10]Enron-New World Encyclopedia(2017) Available at:http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/ entry/Enron(accessed: 11 Nov 2018).