
info@juzhikan.asia
Shandong Women’s University, Jinan, Shandong, 250300;
Abstract:The author writes this paper to present the generalization of critical period hypothesis and to illustrate the main opinions towards it. To begin with, the author explains the creation of critical period hypothesis, from the perspective of neurolinguistics and Universal Grammar. Secondly, the author summarizes and demonstrates the fundamental opinions to critical period hypothesis, for theories which are in favor of and are against it, and in different degree, namely, the radical and the mild. In this part, the author elaborates these matters from the points as language multiple-levels, the process and route of second language acquisition, the proficiency of second language acquisition, mother tongue’s transfer, empirical studies about second language acquisition and some general doubts. Together with these, the author also displays some of her own thoughts on certain standpoints. At last, the author concludes that people are born with the ability to acquire second language, but the proficiency and ultimate attainment of second language acquisition may depend on initial age, besides, the author also delivers that the existence of critical period on second language acquisition is hard to assure through examination.
Keywords: critical period hypothesis; theories of the proponents; doctrines of the opponents
References
[1]Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. Tesol Quarterly.21, 617-641
[2]Collier, V.P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. Tesol Quarterly.23.509-531
[3]Genesee, F. (2000).Brain Research: Implications for Second Language Learning. Occacitional Reports.12, 202-203.
[4]Hakuta, K, Bialystok, E&Wiley, E. (2003)Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science. 14.31-38
[5]Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.5, 261-263.
[6]Snow, C. E. (1972).Mothers’ speech to children learning language. Child Development. 43, 549-565
[7Ellis,R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
[8]Freeman, L & Long, M .H. (2000).An introduction to second language acquisition research. Foreignlanguage teaching and research press.
[9]Dai, M. C.(1994)。A Brief Discussion on the Age Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Foreign Language World,54, 18-22.
[10]Hao,G.W.,Yang ,L.R.,&Lai,Y.(2007).The review of research on the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition abroad.Journal of Ocean University of China,6, 81-84。
[11]Jing,M.,Deng,X.Y.,&Ou, P.Y.(2010).The 50-year debate on the critical period hypothesis of second language acquisition.Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 9, 10-16.
[12]Lu, X.(2004)。The study on critical period hypothesisin language acquisition and one-step English teaching approach.Foreign Language World,99,62-68。
[13]Liu,Z.Q.(2003).A review of research on the critical period hypothesis of second language acquisition.Contemporary Linguistics,2,158-172.
[14]Wang, L.F. &Li, Y. (2002).New advances in the research on the critical period hypothesis of second language acquisition - Review of second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis.Journal of Foreign Languages.138, 76-79。
[15]Xin,K.&Zhou,S.L.(2006).The influence of age on second language acquisition: Empirical evidence for the critical period hypothesis. Foreign Language Education.27, 80-82。
[16]Yang,L.R.(2004). Research on the critical period hypothesis and optimal age for second language acquisition.Foreign Language Research.120,101-106.
[17]Yang, L.R.&Zhang,D.L.(2007). Second Language Acquisition Research and Chinese Foreign Language Teaching.Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press